Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#337 closed enhancement (fixed)
HTML (limited) support, in addition to Markdown
| Reported by: | maiki interi | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | |
| Component: | programming | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description
I see from `#362 </issues/362>`_, `#363 </issues/363>`_ and `#410 </issues/410>`_ that a lot of effort was put into Markdown support. And `#379 </issues/379>`_ demonstrates that the fields have to be scrubbed anyhow. So, I am wondering if it is possible allow/configure HTML in all the applicable fields. Without getting into it, I use HTML, Textile and Markdown (and various wiki syntaxes) habitually, but hardly anyone else I know does. All my cool friends know how to create an anchor element in HTML, though. Of course white-listing elements is probably useful. I imagine that this could be configured with overrides, but it is fairly simple to find a reasonable default set of elements to allow. Thoughts?
Change History (6)
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Christopher Webber wrote:
Makes sense. I wonder if we want to wait for a real plugin system
before we do this?
I think that would great. I presume that mg will have a default set
of plugins that contain features that not everyone will use, but a
lot of people will. One that provides multi-tiered (to be able to
use multiple syntaxes at once, in a specific order) text filtering
would be awesome.
The common filters I use for websites are full and limited *HTML*,
*Markdown* and *Textile*. So-called "limited" HTML filters normally
have a couple of useful presets, like line-breaks become new
paragraphs, and certain patterns become links
(`http://example.org <http://example.org>`_ and
`mail@addresses.com <mailto:mail@addresses.com>`_).
If the plugin loaded arbitrary filter sets, we could do some fun
shortcodes, like ``[[t:Awesome Pics]]`` going to
``/tag/awesome-pics``.
Okay, I will keep this issue in mind for when we get to plugins.
=]
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
The original url for this bug was http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/689 .
Relations:
#77: related, #78: related, #120: related, #338: related
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
| Type: | defect → enhancement |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
