Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 12 years ago
#71 closed defect (FIXED)
Decisions on thumbnail size / main image display size
|Reported by:||Christopher Allan Webber||Owned by:||Jef van Schendel|
We need to make decisions on what the thumbnail size should be as a standard... currently it's 200x200. What should be the maximum width and height for resizing media that are are in media "display pages"?
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Sucks re: laptop crash. Thoughts: - flickr's resolutions are a lot lower by default, same with img.ur (but both also put stuff "on the side") - `http://www.flickr.com/photos/mlinksva/5720062125/in/photostream <http://www.flickr.com/photos/mlinksva/5720062125/in/photostream>`_ - `http://imgur.com/gallery/LjKuK <http://imgur.com/gallery/LjKuK>`_ - however we were talking about "putting the media at the center of the viewing"... is this still what we want to do? - smartphones are an important consideration that I don't know what to think about :) Assuming we're still "putting media at the center" though probably this is the best route. It's a good place to start anyhow! :)
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
960px is a good size for full screen image, cuz' its small enough to view it a netbook +1
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
Update: we're now using `960.gs <http://960.gs/>`_. This means that all pages (or at least, the content area of all pages) are now 940 pixels wide. So if we use the full width of the page, we can have 3, 4 or 6 columns with a width of 300px, 220px or 140px each, respectively. I think our choice depends on what other information we also want to display. For instance, do we want titles underneath? Also the owner? Or maybe nothing at all? Flickr for instance uses these really dense image grids without text, which are also fun, but maybe a bit too far. Anyhow, I can whip up some example designs for this, then we can choose the one we like most. Feel free to suggest something you'd like to see!
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
Great, looking forward to seeing mockups. How about something along lines of: :: | MediaGoblin [user] | |-----------------------------| | Title | | (author) <- smaller | | .---------------. .-------. | | | | | | | | | | | Meta- | | | | Image content | | data | | | | | |_______| | | | | | | | | '---------------' | Other | | | .---------------. | stuff | | | | Description | | | | | | and etc goes | | | | | | here!!!!!! | | | | | '---------------' | | | | COMMENTS | | | | .---------------. | | | | | Wow amazing!! | | | | | | - erica | | | | | '---------------' | | | | .---------------. '-------' | | | Yeah gr8 | |
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
|Milestone:||0.0.3 → 0.0.4|
|Status:||New → In Progress|
I've pushed a commit which changes the gallery. The thumbnail width is now 180px. If this turns out okay, I propose these maximum sizes: Width: **180px** Height: **135px** So an aspect ratio of 4:3. Images that are, for instance, 3:2 will still be 180px wide but will be smaller vertically, so 120px in that case. I'll let know how things work out in this ticket.
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
I think we've made enough of a decision by now. Thumbs: 180x180 Display media: 640x640 (or at least, that for images, and 640 width max)
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
|Status:||In Progress → Closed|
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
The original url for this bug was http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/356 .
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.