Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#167 closed defect (wontfix)
Update licensing policy so that Javascript files are LGPL — at Version 6
| Reported by: | Christopher Allan Webber | Owned by: | Will Kahn-Greene |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | programming | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description (last modified by )
Based on this conversation and other thoughts I've been having: `http://identi.ca/conversation/74246577#notice-76771977 <http://identi.ca/conversation/74246577#notice-76771977>`_ It probably makes sense if our Javascript files are licensed as LGPL (or apache? but probably LGPL). We currently don't have any license on them, so this should be easy to do right now as it requires no relicensing really. (This says nothing of "javascript snippets in the template"... probably we just shouldn't have those anyway.)
Change History (6)
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
| Status: | New → In Progress |
|---|
We don't have an JavaScript files, yet. So I updated the COPYING file to reflect what we plan to do. This is in merge request `#13 </issues/13>`_ waiting for approval.
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
| Status: | In Progress → Closed |
|---|
The changes are merged in and I'm pretty sure this is done now. Marking this as closed. (Chris, if that seems wrong, please feel free to fix it.)
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
| Milestone: | → 0.0.4 |
|---|---|
| Status: | Closed → Feedback |
I'm temporarily un-suspending this as I wait on some feedback from Brett Smith, whom I always seem to be terrorizing with license questions.
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
| Status: | accepted → closed |
We've decided to not do this and I'm pretty sure I changed things to that effect anyway.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
