Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 13 years ago
#62 closed defect (FIXED)
slug uniqueness as db constraint
Reported by: | Elrond | Owned by: | Christopher Allan Webber |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.0.2 |
Component: | programming | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description
slugs need to be unique (either global or per user, I don't know). This should not be handled in the app layer. This should be handled at the db layer via constraints. See `#320 </issues/320>`_ for a related issue. current app layer check is in models.py:MediaEntry.generate\_slug()
Change History (10)
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
I took a look at the code and it looks like, though we might need to add migrations to remove indexes, to add new indexes all we need to do is simply define them in indexes = []. ...I think :)
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
I think this means that if for some reason we **do** fail to detect slug uniqueness and save and then get an error, we should try making up for it later, maybe? We could be pretty lazy: try catching the exception later on and try "fixing" it by re-running the slug generation method and saving, and if that doesn't fix it, then damn. That's not high priority to me though. Just getting this index into here is high priority still.
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
I made a change for this, committed it, realized we actually want uniqueness by uploader & slug (since the username is part of the slug) then realized that we still need to fix `http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/340 <http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/340>`_ ... We should fix that, then uncomment the index code, make sure it works, push.
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Note that I created a new ticket about indexing: `http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/342 <http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/342>`_ but that ticket should **not** block this ticket getting resolved. It's okay to use mongokit's indexing solution for now.
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Interesting side effect of this I didn't realize: `http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Indexes#Indexes-MissingKeys <http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Indexes#Indexes-MissingKeys>`_ means that if we do this slugs will not be optional but mandatory, because you can't have one user with two MediaEntries with null slug values. This might create a paradox: :: - you want to create a new mediaentry and use its objectid as the slug, but you have to save to get the objectid - if you save you'll have a null slug and that breaks things I think there's a solution though: insert the '\_id' parameter with an ObjectId that we generate from the start: `http://api.mongodb.org/python/current/api/bson/objectid.html?highlight=objectid#bson.objectid <http://api.mongodb.org/python/current/api/bson/objectid.html?highlight=objectid#bson.objectid>`_ that way we also don't have to do this in mediagoblin.submit.views.submit\_start(): :: entry.save(validate=False) tl;dr: - we should generate an objectid from the beginning and set it to a brand new MediaEntry['\_id'] - we should make slugs mandatory; worst come to worst they're just the unicode reprsentation of the MediaEntry['\_id'] - at that point I think we can turn on the "uniqueness" index and we'll be safe.
comment:7 by , 13 years ago
Component: | → Programming |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 0.0.3 |
Owner: | set to |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.