Opened 12 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#503 closed enhancement (no-action)
Write tests for the OAuth plugin
Reported by: | joar | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | programming | Keywords: | test |
Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description
Add test coverage for
- Client registration
- Client authorization
- Token endpoint
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | 0.3.2 → 0.3.3 |
---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | 0.3.3 → 0.3.4 |
---|
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
IIRC nyergler is working on this.
Nathan, do you want to join us this weekend and sprint on this? Otherwise, maybe an update to where things are? (Actually, iirc you may be sprinting at pycon :))
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
Status: | assigned → in_progress |
---|
Hi! I'm moving this ticket from "assigned" to in_progress per our new workflow. Please update the ticket and let us know if you're still working on this. If you are, super great! If not, we'll remove the claim and move it back to "accepted" in a couple of weeks.
Thanks!
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|---|
Status: | in_progress → accepted |
I'm going to assume that nyergler is no longer working on this. If you are, feel free to reclaim this.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | 0.5.0 → 0.6.0 |
---|
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | 0.6.0 → 0.7.0 |
---|
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
Keywords: | test added |
---|
comment:10 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 0.7.0 |
---|
comment:11 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | → no-action-required |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
My feeling is that one should write tests at the time the original code is written, or otherwise the next time you have to make any non-trivial change to that code (eg. fixing a bug). Writing tests for the sake of it is a pretty low-value activity. I don't think there's any use in having tickets like "write tests for blah".
We'd like this but it can be postponed for 0.3.3
I also think nyergler was looking into some of this but ran into problems because it's not possible presently to instantiate an app with a different config in the current codebase for tests?