Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 months ago
#426 closed defect (fixed)
"Separate Celery" section outdated
| Reported by: | joar | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | documentation | Keywords: | docs bitesized |
| Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description (last modified by )
http://docs.mediagoblin.org/siteadmin/production-deployments.html#separate-celery
We now use ./lazycelery.sh, elrond might know more about the intended use of this.
Change History (15)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.3.0 → 0.3.1 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Keywords: | bitesized added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
| Owner: | removed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
| Keywords: | docs, bitesized → docs bitesized |
|---|
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
| Component: | component1 → documentation |
|---|
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 0.3.1 → 0.3.4 |
Updated the main text of the bug to have the correct URL.
Yes, that part of the docs needs to talk about lazycelery.sh.
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | removed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → accepted |
Yes, this is a real bug. Changing to "accepted".
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.5.0 → 0.6.0 |
|---|
comment:11 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.6.0 → 0.7.0 |
|---|
comment:12 by , 10 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.7.0 → 0.8.0 |
|---|
I'm kind of tired of moving around the release milestone on this. I'd like to put it on for 0.8.0, but if we don't get it to then, I'm removing the milestone altogether. We shouldn't be assigning milestones unless we *expect* to complete for them.
comment:13 by , 10 years ago
I'm not sure who lazycelery is designed for. If you're hacking on mediagoblin you don't really need it because ./lazyserver handles that for you and if you're deploying for production then you also don't want this as you'd likely want an init script and such and also ./lazystarter always sets CELERY_ALWAYS_EAGER to true even when starting lazycelery so you have all the problems of lazyserver having an always eager celery.
Is someone able to give a use case of this?
comment:14 by , 10 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.8.0 |
|---|
comment:15 by , 13 months ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | accepted → closed |
Closing. The documentation on deploying with separate Celery is now pretty thorough.
I don't really understand what this bug is about.
Is the text currently in the docs correct?
Is this bug about removing the Separate Celery section or about updating it to some other text?
Joar: If you can give me more direction about what this bug is about, I can work on it for 0.3.2.