#314 closed enhancement (fixed)
Mozilla Persona (BrowserID) support
Reported by: | Christopher Allan Webber | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.5.0 |
Component: | programming | Keywords: | auth |
Cc: | Parent Tickets: |
Description (last modified by )
Talked to the openphoto people. They have browserid support, which looks easy and pleasant: `https://browserid.org/ <https://browserid.org/>`_ Furthermore, the OpenPhoto people say it's easy. So why not support it? :) :: <paroneayea> hub: we don't use browserid yet <paroneayea> but I'd like to <jmathai> paroneayea: said there's a json spec but it's not finalized yet <paroneayea> how hard is browserid to implement? <paroneayea> it looks beautifully pleasant to use <jmathai> trivial <paroneayea> really? <paroneayea> awesome
Change History (10)
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Do we **have to** nix the idea of registration? Can't we associated a browserid with a registered account as an easier way to log in? Alternately, use browserid for accelerated registration?
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
Summary: | BrowserID support → Mozilla Persona (BrowserID) support |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Okay, here's some updates. More generally, I'm updating this as a "support multiple authentication login systems" ticket.
- We have a plugin system. Yayy!
- I need to have a better understanding of it. Because of that, I'm working on #477 so I can actually do some plugin work myself.
- After that's done I'd like to evaluate the state of login stuff and how we can make it more flexible.
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
Keywords: | auth added |
---|
Note: if the pluggable auth stuff happens for GSoC/OPW, this ticket might wrap into it.
http://wiki.mediagoblin.org/GSOC_2013#Pluggable_user_authentication_.26_implementations
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → in_progress |
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|---|
Status: | in_progress → review |
need basic_auth and openid branches to land first as this is branch is based off of those.
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | → 0.5.0 |
---|